Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Mbenails

mbenails.ch
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 E-commerce 🇨🇭Switzerland

Mbenails uses Seguno as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is incomplete (score 50/100). Missing: DMARC, DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPSeguno
Total observations3
Active days2
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity📬 Active · 10 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Mbenails with another brand:

Email setup 50/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Setup has gaps
Some authentication is missing or weak — receivers may give less benefit of the doubt.
50/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
missing
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 5/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

No DMARC record published. Domain is not protected against spoofing.

SPF alignment: all 3 observed emails use a return-path aligned with mbenails.ch (bounces.mbenails.ch). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 3 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with mbenails.ch (mbenails.ch). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Seguno ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

SparkPost

Probed: mbenails.ch, bounces.mbenails.ch

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 3 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Seguno 3
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 13 – Jun 20, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Seguno: 1 (2026-06-13)1Seguno: 2 (2026-06-20)206/1306/1406/1506/1606/1706/1806/1906/20
Seguno

Similar brands using Seguno

Sending IPs

IP addresses mbenails.ch has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
192.174.87.210 mta-174-87-210.sparkpostmail.com 2 2 Check →
192.174.93.76 mta-174-93-76.seguno.com.sparkpostmail.com 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
mbenails.chSeguno 3