Mayachia uses Klaviyo — ESP Tracker

Mayachia uses Klaviyo as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is incomplete (score 50/100). Missing: DMARC, DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESP

Klaviyo

Total observations2

Active days1

Avg per active day2.0

Last activity📬 Active · yesterday

Cadenceone-off

Interested in using Klaviyo?

Learn about the pros and cons at .

Read the review →

Compare Mayachia with another brand:

Email setup 50/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

⚠

Setup has gaps

Some authentication is missing or weak — receivers may give less benefit of the doubt.

50/100

SPF

pass

DKIM

pass

DMARC

multiple records

BIMI

none

Unsubscribe

one-click

SPF lookups 2/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

Multiple DMARC records published — receivers apply no DMARC at all (RFC 7489). The domain is effectively unprotected until the duplicate record is removed.

SPF alignment: all 2 observed emails use a return-path aligned with mayachia.com (k3.send.mayachia.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 2 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with mayachia.com (send.mayachia.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Transport & deliverability

Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 2 sends).

Gmail trust warnings observed

🚩 Suspicious-images banner ("This message appears suspicious") — observed on 2 emails (100% of tracked) · last seen Jun 30, 2026

Gmail's own filter showed these warnings to real subscribers in their inbox — independent of SPF/DKIM/DMARC pass/fail status. A consistent pattern often signals reputation issues or brand-impersonation concerns.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Klaviyo ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Microsoft 365

Probed: mayachia.com, k3.send.mayachia.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

Folder	Count	Share
promotions	2	100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP	Emails	Placement	Inbox %	Tabs %	Spam %
Klaviyo	2		0.0%	100.0%	0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 30 – Jun 30, 2026 · 1 day with sends

Last 30d Last 90d

By ESP By inbox/spam

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

⚠

Klaviyo ⚠ Gmail warning