Marksandspencer uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. They rank #4,915 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 8 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to agari-eu.com. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: 96% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (bounce.news.marksandspencer.com, bounce.service.marksandspencer.com); the rest use third-party paths (red-robot.net) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 26 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with marksandspencer.com (news.marksandspencer.com, service.marksandspencer.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 33% TLS 1.3, 67% TLS 1.2 (across 9 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 3 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: marksandspencer.com, bounce.news.marksandspencer.com, bounce.service.marksandspencer.com, red-robot.net, news.marksandspencer.com, service.marksandspencer.com, outlet.marksandspencer.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 10 | 43.5% |
| promotions | 13 | 56.5% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce MC | 21 | 47.6% | 52.4% | 0.0% |
Monthly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses marksandspencer.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66.231.95.42 | mta.news.marksandspencer.com |
5 | — | Check → |
| 68.232.196.175 | mta.service.marksandspencer.com |
5 | — | Check → |
| 198.245.88.55 | mta2.news.marksandspencer.com |
5 | 3 | Check → |
| 68.232.205.160 | bf160.mta.exacttarget.com |
5 | 3 | Check → |
| 13.111.59.244 | mta3.news.marksandspencer.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 68.232.195.107 | mta.newsletter.marksandspencer.ie |
3 | — | Check → |
| 68.232.195.65 | mta.newsletter.outlet.marksandspencer.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
news.marksandspencer.com | Salesforce MC 26 | |
service.marksandspencer.com | Salesforce MC 6 |