Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Local400

local400.org
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Nonprofit 🇺🇸United States

Local400 uses SendGrid as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Transactional ESPSendGrid
Total observations4
Active days4
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity📬 Active · 13 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Local400 with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 2/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to thinksocially.com. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: all 4 observed emails use a return-path aligned with local400.org (em3545.local400.org). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 4 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with local400.org (local400.org). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

SendGrid ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Microsoft 365

Probed: local400.org, em3545.local400.org

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 4 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
SendGrid 4
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 27 – Jun 17, 2026 · 4 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 SendGrid: 1 (2026-05-27)1SendGrid: 1 (2026-06-03)1SendGrid: 1 (2026-06-10)1SendGrid: 1 (2026-06-17)105/2705/3006/0206/0506/0806/1106/1406/17
SendGrid

Similar brands using SendGrid

Sending IPs

IP addresses local400.org has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
167.89.57.84 o9.mailings.actionnetwork.org 1 Check →
167.89.33.97 o3.mailings.actionnetwork.org 1 Check →
168.245.78.145 o38.ptr738.actionnetwork.org 1 Check →
167.89.57.73 o8.mailings.actionnetwork.org 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
local400.orgSendGrid 4