Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Legislation

legislation.gov.au
🌐Web popularity #23,824

Legislation uses Amazon SES as their primary email service provider. They're the #23,824 most-visited website overall, per Tranco (a web-popularity measure, not an email one). Their email authentication setup is incomplete (score 50/100). Missing: DMARC, DMARC enforcement, one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPAmazon SES
Total observations1
Active days1
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity💤 Dormant · 10 months ago
Cadenceone-off
Compare Legislation with another brand:

Email setup 50/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Setup has gaps
Some authentication is missing or weak — receivers may give less benefit of the doubt.
50/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
missing
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 3/10
Authentication

No DMARC record published. Domain is not protected against spoofing.

SPF alignment: all 1 observed email use a return-path aligned with legislation.gov.au (mail.legislation.gov.au). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with legislation.gov.au (legislation.gov.au). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Amazon SES ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Microsoft 365

Probed: legislation.gov.au, mail.legislation.gov.au

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 1 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Amazon SES 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Aug 30 – Aug 30, 2025 · 1 day with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Amazon SES: 1 (2025-08-30)108/30
Amazon SES

Similar brands using Amazon SES

Sending IPs

IP addresses legislation.gov.au has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
69.169.232.5 b232-5.smtp-out.ap-southeast-2.amazonses.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
legislation.gov.auAmazon SES 1