Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Juliaschuerer uses MailerLite as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).

Marketing ESPMailerLite
Total observations5
Active days5
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity📬 Active · 6 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Interested in using MailerLite?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Juliaschuerer with another brand:

Email setup 85/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
85/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (reject)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 2/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to juliaschuerer.com. Policy p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 5 observed emails use a return-path aligned with juliaschuerer.com (inbox.juliaschuerer.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 5 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with juliaschuerer.com (juliaschuerer.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

MailerLite ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: juliaschuerer.com, inbox.juliaschuerer.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
promotions 5 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
MailerLite 5
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 3 – Jun 24, 2026 · 5 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 MailerLite: 1 (2026-06-03)1MailerLite: 1 (2026-06-08)1MailerLite: 1 (2026-06-12)1MailerLite: 1 (2026-06-15)1MailerLite: 1 (2026-06-24)106/0306/0606/0906/1206/1506/1806/2106/24
MailerLite

Similar brands using MailerLite

Sending IPs

IP addresses juliaschuerer.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
185.225.161.36 mail036.mlsend.com 1 Check →
185.225.161.38 mail038.mlsend.com 1 Check →
185.225.161.16 mail016.mlsend.com 1 Check →
185.225.161.43 mail043.mlsend.com 1 Check →
185.225.161.27 mail027.mlsend.com 1 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
juliaschuerer.comMailerLite 5