Joon uses Postmark as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to Postmark DMARC. Policy
p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.
SPF alignment: 95% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (pm-bounces.joon.io); the rest use third-party paths (bf04x.hubspotemail.net) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 14 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with joon.io (joon.io). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 2 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: joon.io, pm-bounces.joon.io, bf04x.hubspotemail.net
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 21 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postmark | 18 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses joon.io has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104.245.209.200 | mta200a-ord.mtasv.net |
6 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.235 | mta235b-ord.mtasv.net |
3 | 2 | Check → |
| 104.245.209.203 | mta203a-ord.mtasv.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.237 | mta237b-ord.mtasv.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 50.31.205.205 | mta205-ab1.mtasv.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.202 | mta202a-ord.mtasv.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 50.31.205.203 | mta203-ab1.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 143.244.90.189 | bd77gh7.bf04x.hubspotemail.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.246 | mta246b-ord.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 104.245.209.231 | mta231b-ord.mtasv.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
joon.io | Postmark 20 |