Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Interviewquery

interviewquery.com
🏆Rank #404,010

Interviewquery uses Mailjet as their primary email service provider. They rank #404,010 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Transactional ESPMailjet
Total observations1
Active days1
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity📬 Active · 2 weeks ago
Cadenceone-off
Compare Interviewquery with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 4/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to interviewquery.com. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (a1384186.bnc3.mailjet.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with interviewquery.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with interviewquery.com (hello.interviewquery.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Mailjet ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: interviewquery.com, a1384186.bnc3.mailjet.com, hello.interviewquery.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 1 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Mailjet 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 16 – Jun 16, 2026 · 1 day with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Mailjet: 1 (2026-06-16)106/16
Mailjet

Similar brands using Mailjet

Sending IPs

IP addresses interviewquery.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
87.253.234.153 o153.p9.mailjet.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
hello.interviewquery.comMailjet 1