Iamnontas uses ActiveCampaign for marketing email and SparkPost for transactional/notifications. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 90/100). We've recorded 1 ESP change since first observing this brand.
Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.
| HTML builder |
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 3 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to dmarcinput.com. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (s1.acemsrve.com, bounce.webinargeek.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with iamnontas.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 37 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with iamnontas.com (iamnontas.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 7 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: iamnontas.com, s1.acemsrve.com, bounce.webinargeek.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 36 | 97.3% |
| promotions | 1 | 2.7% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ActiveCampaign | 29 | 96.6% | 3.4% | 0.0% | |
| SparkPost | 8 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses iamnontas.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 192.92.97.223 | s1.acemsrve.com |
10 | 1 | Check → |
| 192.92.97.225 | s3.acemsrve.com |
8 | — | Check → |
| 147.253.220.187 | mta-220-187.sparkpostmail.com |
8 | — | Check → |
| 192.92.97.184 | s10.avl1.acemsrva.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 192.92.97.227 | s5.acemsrve.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 192.92.97.226 | s4.acemsrve.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
iamnontas.com | ActiveCampaign 29 SparkPost 8 |