Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Greenme

greenme.it
🌐Web popularity #42,086

Greenme uses Amazon SES as their primary email service provider. They're the #42,086 most-visited website overall, per Tranco (a web-popularity measure, not an email one). Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Transactional ESPAmazon SES
Total observations5
Active days1
Avg per active day5.0
Last activity💤 Dormant · 8 weeks ago
Cadenceone-off
Compare Greenme with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 2/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to greenme.it. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: all 5 observed emails use a return-path aligned with greenme.it (newsletter.greenme.it). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 5 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with greenme.it (greenme.it). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Amazon SES ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: greenme.it, newsletter.greenme.it

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
promotions 3 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Amazon SES 3
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 6 – May 6, 2026 · 1 day with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

5 0 Amazon SES: 5 (2026-05-06)505/06
Amazon SES

Similar brands using Amazon SES

Sending IPs

IP addresses greenme.it has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
54.240.7.25 a7-25.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com 5 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
greenme.itAmazon SES 5