Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Greenhouse Mail

greenhouse-mail.io
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 SaaS ✓ Inbox 100%

Greenhouse Mail uses Mailgun as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 65/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Transactional ESPMailgun
Total observations20
Active days9
Avg per active day2.2
Last activity📬 Active · 12 days ago
Cadence~monthly
Compare Greenhouse Mail with another brand:

Email setup 65/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
65/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
standard
SPF lookups 1/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 4 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to greenhouse.io. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

DKIM alignment: all 16 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with greenhouse-mail.io (us.greenhouse-mail.io). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: 0% TLS 1.3, 100% TLS 1.2 (across 7 sends).

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Mailgun ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: greenhouse-mail.io, us.greenhouse-mail.io

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 19 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Mailgun 19
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Dec 1, 2025 – Jun 15, 2026 · 6 weeks with sends

Weekly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

6 0 Mailgun: 1 (week of 2025-12-01)1Mailgun: 4 (week of 2026-05-18)4Mailgun: 6 (week of 2026-05-25)6Mailgun: 1 (week of 2026-06-01)1Mailgun: 4 (week of 2026-06-08)4Mailgun: 4 (week of 2026-06-15)4Dec 1 '25Dec 22 '25Jan 12 '26Feb 2 '26Feb 23 '26Mar 16 '26Apr 6 '26Apr 27 '26May 18 '26Jun 8 '26
Mailgun

Similar brands using Mailgun

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
us.greenhouse-mail.ioMailgun 20