Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Frutamare

frutamare.net
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Food & Beverage 🇪🇸Spain

Frutamare uses ActiveCampaign as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPActiveCampaign
Total observations7
Active days2
Avg per active day3.5
Last activity💤 Dormant · 5 weeks ago
Cadence~every 2 weeks
Interested in using ActiveCampaign?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Frutamare with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 2/10
Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: all 5 observed emails use a return-path aligned with frutamare.net (em-891268.frutamare.net). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 5 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with frutamare.net (frutamare.net). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

ActiveCampaign ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: frutamare.net, em-891268.frutamare.net

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 2 40.0%
promotions 3 60.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
ActiveCampaign 3
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 5 – May 28, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

5 0 ActiveCampaign: 2 (2026-05-05)2ActiveCampaign: 5 (2026-05-28)505/0505/0805/1105/1405/1705/2005/2305/2605/28
ActiveCampaign

Similar brands using ActiveCampaign

Sending IPs

IP addresses frutamare.net has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
217.8.118.27 mail27.euc1.acems2.com 5 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
frutamare.netActiveCampaign 7