Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Feedbackflowhq

feedbackflowhq.com
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 SaaS

Feedbackflowhq uses Brevo for marketing email and Amazon SES for transactional/notifications. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPBrevo
Transactional ESPAmazon SES
Total observations2
Active days2
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity💤 Dormant · 5 weeks ago
Cadence~weekly
Interested in using Brevo?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Feedbackflowhq with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 3/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to brevo.com. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: 50% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (send.mail.feedbackflowhq.com); the rest use third-party paths (af.d.mailin.fr) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with feedbackflowhq.com (mail.feedbackflowhq.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Amazon SES ✓ confirmed Brevo ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: feedbackflowhq.com, af.d.mailin.fr, send.mail.feedbackflowhq.com, mail.feedbackflowhq.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 2 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Brevo 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Amazon SES 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 19 – May 26, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Brevo: 1 (2026-05-19)1Amazon SES: 1 (2026-05-26)105/1905/2005/2105/2205/2305/2405/2505/26
Brevo Amazon SES

Similar brands using Brevo

Sending IPs

IP addresses feedbackflowhq.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
185.41.28.6 af.d.mailin.fr 1 Check →
54.240.6.53 a6-53.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
feedbackflowhq.comBrevo 1
mail.feedbackflowhq.comAmazon SES 1