Ermitazas uses Omnisend as their primary email service provider. They rank #80,333 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 4 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to ermitazas.lt. Policy
p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.
DKIM alignment: all 17 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with ermitazas.lt (ermitazas.lt). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 0% TLS 1.3, 100% TLS 1.2 (across 9 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 3 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: ermitazas.lt
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 23 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omnisend | 21 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses ermitazas.lt has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 204.220.169.14 | g14.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
5 | 2 | Check → |
| 204.220.169.12 | g12.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.118 | g118.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.119 | g119.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.6 | g6.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.120 | g120.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.134 | g134.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.129 | g129.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.74 | g74.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.68 | g68.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.131 | g131.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.92 | g92.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.69 | g69.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.94 | g94.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.141 | g141.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 204.220.169.95 | g95.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| 204.220.169.127 | g127.gb126d70.use4.send.mailgun.net |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
ermitazas.lt | Omnisend 23 |
