Dicha uses MailerLite as their primary email service provider. We've also observed sends via ActiveCampaign. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.
| HTML builder |
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 3 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.
SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (mlsend.com, mail36.use2.acems3.com, mail41.use2.acems3.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with dicha.gr, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 7 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with dicha.gr (dicha.gr). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
ActiveCampaign 3ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.
Probed: dicha.gr, mail36.use2.acems3.com, mlsend.com, mail41.use2.acems3.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 4 | 57.1% |
| promotions | 3 | 42.9% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ActiveCampaign | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| MailerLite | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses dicha.gr has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.128.44.38 | mail38.use2.acems3.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 185.225.161.26 | mail026.mlsend.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 185.225.161.44 | mail044.mlsend.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 52.128.44.41 | mail41.use2.acems3.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| 185.225.161.62 | mail062.mlsend.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| 185.225.161.69 | mail069.mlsend.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
dicha.gr | MailerLite 4 ActiveCampaign 3 |