Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Createsend

createsend.com
🏆Rank #18,675 🏷 Marketing & Agencies 🇦🇺Australia

Createsend uses Campaign Monitor as their primary email service provider. They rank #18,675 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPCampaign Monitor
Total observations3
Active days2
Avg per active day1.5
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 2 weeks ago
Cadence~every 5 months
Compare Createsend with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 2/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to Red Sift OnDMARC. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (cmail20.com, cmail19.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with createsend.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 3 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with createsend.com (createsend.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Campaign Monitor ✓ via sending IP

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: createsend.com, cmail20.com, cmail19.com, outbound.createsend.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 2 66.7%
spam 1 33.3%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Campaign Monitor 3
66.7% 0.0% 33.3%

ESP activity over time

Jun 14 – Jun 14, 2026 · 1 day with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Campaign Monitor: 1 (2026-06-14)106/14
Campaign Monitor

Similar brands using Campaign Monitor

Sending IPs

IP addresses createsend.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
203.55.21.5 mx5.a.outbound.createsend.com 2 Check →
203.55.21.39 mx39.a.outbound.createsend.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
createsend.comCampaign Monitor 3