Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Conversionfactory

conversionfactory.co
🌐Web popularity N/A 🏷 Marketing & Agencies

Conversionfactory uses Postmark as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement, one-click unsubscribe.

Transactional ESPPostmark
Total observations6
Active days2
Avg per active day3.0
Last activity📬 Active · yesterday
Cadence~every 3 days
Compare Conversionfactory with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
missing
SPF lookups 1/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 6 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: all 6 observed emails use a return-path aligned with conversionfactory.co (pm-bounces.conversionfactory.co). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 6 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with conversionfactory.co (conversionfactory.co). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Transport & deliverability

TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 6 sends).

Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 6 sends).

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Postmark ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: conversionfactory.co, pm-bounces.conversionfactory.co

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 6 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Postmark 6
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 25 – Jun 30, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

3 0 Postmark: 3 (2026-06-25)3Postmark: 3 (2026-06-30)306/2506/2606/2706/2806/2906/30
Postmark

Similar brands using Postmark

Sending IPs

IP addresses conversionfactory.co has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
104.245.209.197 mta197a-ord.mtasv.net 4 4 Check →
50.31.205.220 mta220-ab1.mtasv.net 2 2 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
conversionfactory.coPostmark 6