Coned uses SendGrid as their primary email service provider. They rank #36,124 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 3 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).
Non-ESP tools detected in this brand's emails. Independent of who sends — a brand can use any combination.
| HTML builder |
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 7 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to coned.com. Policy
p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 23 observed emails use a return-path aligned with coned.com (em632.billing.coned.com, example.email.coned.com, em6971.customerassistance.coned.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 22 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with coned.com (billing.coned.com, email.coned.com, customerassistance.coned.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 11 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 7 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: coned.com, em632.billing.coned.com, example.email.coned.com, em6971.customerassistance.coned.com, billing.coned.com, email.coned.com, customerassistance.coned.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 23 | 95.8% |
| promotions | 1 | 4.2% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SendGrid | 23 | 95.7% | 4.3% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses coned.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168.245.54.129 | o16824554x129.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
13 | 3 | Check → |
| 168.245.110.201 | xvfrszcw.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
5 | 1 | Check → |
| 167.89.53.186 | xtrwprbx.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
2 | — | Check → |
| 168.245.96.22 | xvfrshks.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
2 | 2 | Check → |
| 167.89.78.230 | xtrwqzzs.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net |
1 | — | Check → |
| 198.21.0.119 | o23.notif01.mbcampaign.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |