Citi uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. They rank #3,585 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 85/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 8 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to proofpoint.com. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 35 observed emails use a return-path aligned with citi.com (bounce.info15.citi.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 33 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with citi.com (info15.citi.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 14 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 6 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: citi.com, bounce.info15.citi.com, info15.citi.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 27 | 84.4% |
| promotions | 5 | 15.6% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce MC | 32 | 84.4% | 15.6% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses citi.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.111.204.179 | mta2.info15.citi.com |
8 | — | Check → |
| 128.245.64.132 | mta7.info15.citi.com |
4 | 2 | Check → |
| 128.245.70.3 | mta25.info15.citi.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 128.245.69.251 | mta19.info15.citi.com |
3 | 2 | Check → |
| 128.245.64.129 | mta4.info15.citi.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 128.245.69.253 | mta21.info15.citi.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 128.245.69.252 | mta20.info15.citi.com |
2 | 1 | Check → |
| 128.245.68.101 | mta13.info15.citi.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 128.245.64.134 | mta9.info15.citi.com |
2 | 2 | Check → |
| 128.245.70.1 | mta23.info15.citi.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 128.245.70.5 | mta27.info15.citi.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 13.111.204.180 | mta3.info15.citi.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 13.111.76.252 | mta.info15.citi.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 128.245.70.2 | mta24.info15.citi.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
info15.citi.com | Salesforce MC 35 |