Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Canyon

canyon.com
🏆Rank #28,816 🏷 Automotive 🇩🇪Germany

Canyon uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. They rank #28,816 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 95/100).

Marketing ESPSalesforce MC
Total observations2
Active days2
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity📬 Active · 13 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare Canyon with another brand:

Email setup 95/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Strong email setup
Authentication is in good shape — SPF, DKIM, and DMARC enforcement all configured.
95/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
verified VMC
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 5/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to vali.email. Policy p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: all 2 observed emails use a return-path aligned with canyon.com (bounce.marketing.usa.canyon.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 2 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with canyon.com (marketing.usa.canyon.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Salesforce MC ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Microsoft 365

Probed: canyon.com, bounce.marketing.usa.canyon.com, marketing.usa.canyon.com, usa.canyon.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
promotions 2 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Salesforce MC 2
0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 5 – Jun 17, 2026 · 2 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-06-05)1Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-06-17)106/0506/0706/0906/1106/1306/1506/17
Salesforce MC

Similar brands using Salesforce MC

Sending IPs

IP addresses canyon.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
13.111.28.93 mta.marketing.usa.canyon.com 2 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
marketing.usa.canyon.comSalesforce MC 2