Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Biglobe

biglobe.ne.jp
🏆Rank #4,498

Biglobe uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. They rank #4,498 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 80/100).

Marketing ESPSalesforce MC
Total observations1
Active days1
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity📬 Active · yesterday
Cadenceone-off
Compare Biglobe with another brand:

Email setup 80/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
80/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (quarantine)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 10/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to biglobe.co.jp. Policy p=quarantine means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (bounce.s10.mc.pd25.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with biglobe.ne.jp, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with biglobe.ne.jp (bhc.biglobe.ne.jp). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Salesforce MC ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: biglobe.ne.jp, bounce.s10.mc.pd25.com, bhc.biglobe.ne.jp

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 1 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Salesforce MC 1
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 29 – Jun 29, 2026 · 1 day with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 Salesforce MC: 1 (2026-06-29)106/29
Salesforce MC

Similar brands using Salesforce MC

Sending IPs

IP addresses biglobe.ne.jp has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
13.111.53.45 fh45.mc.pd25.com 1 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
bhc.biglobe.ne.jpSalesforce MC 1