Bejakovic uses Kit as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 10 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to bejakovic.com. Policy
p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.
SPF alignment: 54% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (ckespa.bejakovic.com); the rest use third-party paths (anglernook.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 40 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with bejakovic.com (bejakovic.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
TLS: 20% TLS 1.3, 80% TLS 1.2 (across 15 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 8 sends).
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: bejakovic.com, ckespa.bejakovic.com, anglernook.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 72 | 98.6% |
| promotions | 1 | 1.4% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kit | 54 | 98.1% | 1.9% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses bejakovic.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168.245.126.179 | o4.ck.m.convertkit.com |
9 | — | Check → |
| 168.245.5.113 | o20.ck.n.convertkit.com |
7 | 1 | Check → |
| 149.72.158.9 | o27.ck.m.convertkit.com |
5 | — | Check → |
| 192.254.115.187 | o42.ck.n.convertkit.com |
5 | 1 | Check → |
| 149.72.193.89 | o48.ck.n.convertkit.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 149.72.176.45 | o30.ck.m.convertkit.com |
4 | — | Check → |
| 149.72.60.6 | o47.ck.n.convertkit.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 159.183.200.47 | o51.ck.n.convertkit.com |
3 | — | Check → |
| 149.72.39.237 | o38.ck.n.convertkit.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 149.72.61.159 | o46.ck.n.convertkit.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
bejakovic.com | Kit 76 |