Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Barbend

barbend.com
🏆Rank #57,407 🏷 Media 🇺🇸United States 🚫 Spam 15%

Barbend uses Beehiiv as their primary email service provider. They rank #57,407 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPBeehiiv
Total observations13
Active days5
Avg per active day2.6
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 3 weeks ago
Cadence~every 2 days
Interested in using Beehiiv?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Barbend with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 1/10
Authentication

DMARC reports sent to inkydmarc.com. Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: all 13 observed emails use a return-path aligned with barbend.com (em3090.mail2.barbend.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 11 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with barbend.com (mail2.barbend.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Beehiiv ✓ via SendGrid

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Amazon SES SendGrid

Probed: barbend.com, em3090.mail2.barbend.com, mail2.barbend.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
promotions 11 84.6%
spam 2 15.4%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Beehiiv 13
0.0% 84.6% 15.4%

ESP activity over time

Jun 1 – Jun 7, 2026 · 3 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

3 0 Beehiiv: 2 (2026-06-01)2Beehiiv: 3 (2026-06-03)3Beehiiv: 2 (2026-06-07)206/0106/0206/0306/0406/0506/0606/07
Beehiiv

Similar brands using Beehiiv

Sending IPs

IP addresses barbend.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
149.72.177.117 o107.ptr6072.mail2.barbend.com 13 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
mail2.barbend.comBeehiiv 13