Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

B4ukraine

b4ukraine.org
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Nonprofit 🇺🇦Ukraine

B4ukraine uses SendPulse as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPSendPulse
Total observations5
Active days5
Avg per active day1.0
Last activity📬 Active · 5 days ago
Cadence~weekly
Compare B4ukraine with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 3/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (sendpulse.me) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with b4ukraine.org, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.

DKIM alignment: all 5 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with b4ukraine.org (b4ukraine.org). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

SendPulse ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace

Probed: b4ukraine.org, sendpulse.me

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 5 100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
SendPulse 5
100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

May 21 – Jun 26, 2026 · 5 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

1 0 SendPulse: 1 (2026-05-21)1SendPulse: 1 (2026-05-28)1SendPulse: 1 (2026-06-04)1SendPulse: 1 (2026-06-12)1SendPulse: 1 (2026-06-26)105/2105/2505/2906/0206/0606/1006/1406/1806/2206/26
SendPulse

Similar brands using SendPulse

Sending IPs

IP addresses b4ukraine.org has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsPlacementReputation
213.109.76.109 mx220.sendpulse.me 1 Check →
213.109.76.61 mx182.sendpulse.me 1 Check →
213.109.76.79 mx200.sendpulse.me 1 Check →
213.109.76.115 mx226.sendpulse.me 1 Check →
213.109.76.135 mx246.sendpulse.me 1 1 Check →

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
b4ukraine.orgSendPulse 5