Asics uses Salesforce MC for marketing email and SparkPost for transactional/notifications. They rank #7,273 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. We've also observed sends via SendGrid. Email goes out from 3 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 3 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to DMARC Analyzer (Mimecast). Policy
p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.
SPF alignment: 70% of observed emails use an aligned return-path (bounce.info.asics.com, em3616.asics.com); the rest use third-party paths (spmailtechno.com) where DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: 80% of observed emails sign with an aligned DKIM key (info.asics.com, asics.com); the rest sign with third-party keys (s10.y.mc.salesforce.com) where DMARC has to rely on SPF alignment.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
SendGrid 1ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.
Probed: asics.com, bounce.info.asics.com, spmailtechno.com, em3616.asics.com, info.asics.com, email.asics.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 7 | 100.0% |
Placement observed in Outlook / Microsoft 365 mailboxes. Focused Inbox splits mail into two tabs, "Focused" (inbox) and "Other", plus Junk. 67% landed in Junk across 3 observed Outlook emails.
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SendGrid | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| SparkPost | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Salesforce MC | 3 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Weekly observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses asics.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
info.asics.com | Salesforce MC 4 | |
asics.com | SparkPost 3 SendGrid 1 | |
email.asics.com | Salesforce MC 2 |
