Get Email DetectiveDetect any senderright in your inbox Gmail Outlook

Alts

alts.co
🏆Rank N/A 🏷 Media 🇺🇸United States ✓ Inbox 85% 📧1,000 subscribers

Alts uses Kit as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.

Marketing ESPKit
Total observations13
Active days8
Avg per active day1.6
Last activity⏸ Slowing · 2 weeks ago
Cadence~weekly
Interested in using Kit?
Learn about the pros and cons at .
Read the review →
Compare Alts with another brand:

Email setup 73/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

Solid setup, room to improve
Most authentication signals are present. A couple of pieces would tighten things up.
73/100
SPF
pass
DKIM
pass
DMARC
pass (none)
BIMI
none
Unsubscribe
one-click
SPF lookups 3/10
Authentication

DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.

SPF alignment: all 12 observed emails use a return-path aligned with alts.co (ckespa.alts.co). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 7 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with alts.co (alts.co). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Kit ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

ESPs this brand has authorized in their SPF record. We confirm them with a green ✓ only after seeing recurring use (3+ emails across 2+ days). Until then they stay here — either we haven't observed any email yet, or we've seen a handful but not enough to call them a regular sender for the brand.

Google Workspace SendGrid SendPulse

Probed: alts.co, ckespa.alts.co

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

FolderCountShare
inbox 11 84.6%
promotions 2 15.4%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP Emails Placement Inbox % Tabs % Spam %
Kit 12
83.3% 16.7% 0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 1 – Jun 15, 2026 · 3 days with sends

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

2 0 Kit: 2 (2026-06-01)2Kit: 2 (2026-06-08)2Kit: 1 (2026-06-15)106/0106/0306/0506/0706/0906/1106/1306/15
Kit

Similar brands using Kit

Sending IPs

IP addresses alts.co has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.

IPHostnameObsReputation
149.72.235.3 o33.ck.d.convertkit.com 7 Check →
168.245.119.110 o2.ck.h.convertkit.com 5 Check →
167.89.80.227 o1.ck.h.convertkit.com 1 Check →

Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.

Sending domains

DomainESPs detectedDelivery (7d)
alts.coKit 13