All uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. They rank #162,937 in the Tranco list of most-popular domains. Email goes out from 2 different subdomains. Their email authentication setup is solid (score 100/100).
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 6 emails we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.
DMARC reports sent to accor.com. Policy
p=reject means receivers actively block or quarantine spoofed mail.
SPF alignment: all 18 observed emails use a return-path aligned with all.com (bounce.mail.all.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
DKIM alignment: all 16 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with all.com (mail.all.com, confirmation.all.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
VMC issued by: digicert.
TLS: modern — 100% TLS 1.3 (across 9 sends).
Delivery: fast — 100% of emails in the last 7 days arrive in under 10 seconds (across 6 sends).
Inbox actions: LodgingReservation — schema.org markup Gmail renders as inline buttons.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.
Probed: all.com, bounce.mail.all.com, mail.all.com, confirmation.all.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 11 | 57.9% |
| promotions | 8 | 42.1% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce MC | 18 | 61.1% | 38.9% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses all.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Placement | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161.71.71.97 | mta17.mail.all.com |
5 | 2 | Check → |
| 161.71.71.98 | mta18.mail.all.com |
3 | 2 | Check → |
| 161.71.71.80 | mta.mail.all.com |
3 | 1 | Check → |
| 161.71.71.100 | mta20.mail.all.com |
2 | — | Check → |
| 161.71.71.83 | mta3.mail.all.com |
2 | 1 | Check → |
| 161.71.71.84 | mta4.mail.all.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 161.71.71.99 | mta19.mail.all.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 161.71.71.101 | mta21.mail.all.com |
1 | — | Check → |
| 161.71.71.86 | mta6.mail.all.com |
1 | 1 | Check → |
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
mail.all.com | Salesforce MC 15 | |
confirmation.all.com | Salesforce MC 4 |