Adeccoapps uses Salesforce MC

Adeccoapps uses Salesforce MC as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is incomplete (score 58/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement, one-click unsubscribe.

Marketing ESP

Salesforce MC

Total observations1

Active days1

Avg per active day1.0

Last activity📬 Active · 8 days ago

Cadenceone-off

Compare Adeccoapps with another brand:

Email setup 58/100

Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.

⚠

Setup has gaps

Some authentication is missing or weak — receivers may give less benefit of the doubt.

58/100

SPF

pass

DKIM

pass

DMARC

pass (none)

BIMI

none

Unsubscribe

missing

SPF lookups 1/10

SPF / DKIM / DMARC above reflect the last 1 email we've observed. DMARC policy is read live from DNS.

Authentication

DMARC reports sent to DMARC Analyzer (Mimecast). Policy p=none is monitor-only — receivers won't act on spoofing yet.

SPF alignment: all 1 observed email use a return-path aligned with adeccoapps.com (bounce.info.adeccoapps.com). SPF authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

DKIM alignment: all 1 observed email sign with a domain aligned with adeccoapps.com (info.adeccoapps.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.

Gmail trust warnings observed

🚩 Suspicious-images banner ("This message appears suspicious") — observed on 1 email (100% of tracked) · last seen Jun 23, 2026

Gmail's own filter showed these warnings to real subscribers in their inbox — independent of SPF/DKIM/DMARC pass/fail status. A consistent pattern often signals reputation issues or brand-impersonation concerns.

Other ESPs detected

Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).

None — only the primary ESP(s) shown above

Confirmed senders

ESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.

Salesforce MC ✓ confirmed

Other SPF authorizations

No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.

Probed: adeccoapps.com, bounce.info.adeccoapps.com, info.adeccoapps.com

Where emails landed (Gmail)

Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.

Folder	Count	Share
inbox	1	100.0%

Placement by ESP

Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.

ESP	Emails	Placement	Inbox %	Tabs %	Spam %
Salesforce MC	1		100.0%	0.0%	0.0%

ESP activity over time

Jun 23 – Jun 23, 2026 · 1 day with sends

Last 30d Last 90d

By ESP By inbox/spam

Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.

⚠

Salesforce MC ⚠ Gmail warning