Abundant Valley uses GetResponse as their primary email service provider. Their email authentication setup is good (score 73/100). Missing: DMARC enforcement.
Authentication signals observed in this brand's emails. SPF, DKIM and DMARC are the standard sender-authentication stack — see the DMARC policy below for whether spoofing is actually blocked or just monitored. One-click unsubscribe meets Google & Yahoo's bulk-sender requirements.
DMARC published as p=none with no rua= reporting — monitor-only, and the sender isn't collecting reports either.
SPF alignment: observed emails use a third-party return-path (bounce.gr-mail1.com) — SPF passes there but doesn't align with abundant-valley.com, so DMARC has to rely on DKIM alignment.
DKIM alignment: all 21 observed emails sign with a domain aligned with abundant-valley.com (abundant-valley.com). DKIM authenticates the visible From — supports DMARC directly.
Brands often use multiple ESPs (e.g. one for marketing, another for transactional/notifications).
None — only the primary ESP(s) shown aboveESPs we've seen sending email for this brand. Green = confirmed by SPF, sender IP rDNS, or known infra pairing (label shows the source). Grey = observed but not yet confirmed by SPF or PTR.
No additional ESPs authorized in the brand's SPF beyond the confirmed senders above.
Probed: abundant-valley.com, bounce.gr-mail1.com
Folder distribution across all emails from this brand observed in Gmail inboxes. High inbox % = good deliverability; spam appearances are the headline signal.
| Folder | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| inbox | 5 | 100.0% |
Which ESP's emails are landing where. Sorted by spam % so problem senders surface first. Brands using one ESP for marketing and another for transactional often see very different placement profiles per ESP. Per-ESP folder data only started being captured recently — counts here may be smaller than the total above until backfill catches up.
| ESP | Emails | Placement | Inbox % | Tabs % | Spam % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GetResponse | 5 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Daily observations per ESP. Brands often run multiple ESPs concurrently — marketing on one, transactional on another — so this chart shows usage rather than switches.
IP addresses abundant-valley.com has been observed sending from, and where their mail landed in Gmail.
| IP | Hostname | Obs | Reputation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 104.160.65.6 | mta-6.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
4 | Check → |
| 104.160.65.4 | mta-4.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
4 | Check → |
| 104.160.65.2 | mta-2.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
3 | Check → |
| 104.160.65.8 | mta-8.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
3 | Check → |
| 104.160.65.1 | mta-1.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
3 | Check → |
| 104.160.65.3 | mta-3.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
2 | Check → |
| 104.160.65.5 | mta-5.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
1 | Check → |
| 104.160.65.7 | mta-7.gamma.gr-mail1.com |
1 | Check → |
Per-IP inbox / promotions / spam is being collected and will appear here as new emails are observed.
| Domain | ESPs detected | Delivery (7d) |
|---|---|---|
abundant-valley.com | GetResponse 21 |